Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AI3680 | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| 375.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 37.0 TH/s |
| 5,625 W | Consommation électrique | 2,380 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 64.3 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 7.6 kg |
| 19,193 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,121 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 914% more hashrate (375.0 vs 37.0 TH/s) in the Auradine Teraflux AI3680's favour. That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 914% more hashrate (375.0 vs 37.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 58% better power draw (5,625 vs 2,380 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 77% better efficacité (15.0 vs 64.3 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 136% more heat output (19,193 vs 8,121 BTU/hr)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AI368015.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-2.82/day compared to $-4.66/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH — a difference of 49.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (15.0 vs 64.3 J/TH).
Compare Auradine Teraflux AI3680 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer S17