Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1246

Avalon A1246

Taux de hachage 90.0 TH/s Puissance 3,420 W Efficiency 38.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Taux de hachage 33.0 TH/s Puissance 2,600 W Efficiency 78.8 J/TH

Avalon A1246 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1246 Specification Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
90.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 33.0 TH/s
3,420 W Consommation électrique 2,600 W
38.0 J/TH Efficiency 78.8 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
12.3 kg Weight 10.0 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,871 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1246

Daily Revenue 0.00004072 BTC $2.60
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$5.61
Monthly -$168.23
Yearly -$2,046.77

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Daily Revenue 0.00001493 BTC $0.95
Daily Electricity -$6.24
Daily Profit -$5.29
Monthly -$158.60
Yearly -$1,929.58

Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Avalon A1246 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 173% more hashrate (90.0 vs 33.0 TH/s). The Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Avalon A1246 — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1246 and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1246 173% more hashrate (90.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 24% better power draw (3,420 vs 2,600 W)
  • Avalon A1246 52% better efficacité (38.0 vs 78.8 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 19% better weight (12.3 vs 10.0 kg)
  • Avalon A1246 32% more heat output (11,669 vs 8,871 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1246 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1246 Metric Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
$1,800 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$5.61 Daily net profit -$5.29
-$3,847 Net after 1 year -$1,930
-$5,894 Net after 2 years -$3,859
-$7,940 Net after 3 years -$5,789
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1246

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1246

38.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Avalon A1246 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ is more profitable at $-5.29/day compared to $-5.61/day for the Avalon A1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Avalon A1246 or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Avalon A1246 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1246 or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+?

The Avalon A1246 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Avalon A1246 and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ on J/TH?

The Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ runs at 78.8 J/TH — a difference of 40.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 52% better efficacité (38.0 vs 78.8 J/TH).