Avalon A1366 vs Bitaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1366 | Specification | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1,200.0 GH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 15 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 38 dB |
| 12.6 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1366
Bitaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe Gamma comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 100% better power draw (3,250.0 vs 15.0 W) in the Bitaxe Gamma's favour. The Avalon A1366 claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Avalon A1366 and Bitaxe Gamma actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Avalon A1366 10733% more hashrate (130.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Gamma 100% better power draw (3,250.0 vs 15.0 W)
- Bitaxe Gamma 50% better efficacité (25.0 vs 12.5 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Gamma 49% better noise (75.0 vs 38.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Gamma 98% better weight (12.6 vs 0.3 kg)
- Avalon A1366 21558% more heat output (11,089.0 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Gamma 94% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1366 | Metric | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$4.04 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$4,973 | Net after 1 year | -$99 |
| -$6,446 | Net after 2 years | -$100 |
| -$7,919 | Net after 3 years | -$100 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GammaScore: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Gamma12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1366 or Bitaxe Gamma more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-4.04/day for the Avalon A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1366 or the Bitaxe Gamma better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the Avalon A1366 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1366 or Bitaxe Gamma?
The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Avalon A1366 vs Bitaxe Gamma: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 12.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 50% better efficacité (25.0 vs 12.5 J/TH).