Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1366

Avalon A1366

Taux de hachage 130.0 TH/s Puissance 3,250 W Efficiency 25.0 J/TH
VS

Block Proto Rig

Taux de hachage 819.0 TH/s Puissance 12,000 W Efficiency 14.7 J/TH

Avalon A1366 vs Block Proto Rig

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1366 Specification Block Proto Rig
130.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 819.0 TH/s
3,250 W Consommation électrique 12,000 W
25.0 J/TH Efficiency 14.7 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 80 dB
12.6 kg Weight
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 40,944 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Block Inc

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1366

Daily Revenue 0.00005881 BTC $3.76
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$4.04
Monthly -$121.30
Yearly -$1,475.82

Block Proto Rig

Daily Revenue 0.00037052 BTC $23.67
Daily Electricity -$28.80
Daily Profit -$5.13
Monthly -$153.99
Yearly -$1,873.54

Based on BTC price of $63,875 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Block Proto Rig edges it: 2 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 530% more hashrate (130 vs 819 TH/s). That said, the Avalon A1366 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Block Proto Rig — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Avalon A1366 and Block Proto Rig actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Block Proto Rig 530% more hashrate (130 vs 819 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1366 73% better power draw (3,250 vs 12,000 W)
  • Block Proto Rig 41% better efficacité (25.0 vs 14.7 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1366 6% better noise (75.0 vs 80.0 dB)
  • Block Proto Rig 269% more heat output (11,089 vs 40,944 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Avalon A1366 Metric Block Proto Rig
$3,500 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$4.04 Daily net profit -$5.13
-$4,976 Net after 1 year -$1,874
-$6,452 Net after 2 years -$3,747
-$7,927 Net after 3 years -$5,621
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1366

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Block Proto Rig

14.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1366 or the Block Proto Rig?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1366 is more profitable at $-4.04/day compared to $-5.13/day for the Block Proto Rig. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1366 or Block Proto Rig?

The Avalon A1366 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Block Proto Rig at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1366 or the Block Proto Rig?

The Avalon A1366 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Block Proto Rig). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1366 and Block Proto Rig?

The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Block Proto Rig runs at 14.7 J/TH — a difference of 10.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 41% better efficacité (25.0 vs 14.7 J/TH).