Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1466

Avalon A1466

Taux de hachage 150.0 TH/s Puissance 3,230 W Efficiency 21.5 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M30S++

Whatsminer M30S++

Taux de hachage 112.0 TH/s Puissance 3,472 W Efficiency 31.0 J/TH

Avalon A1466 vs Whatsminer M30S++

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1466 Specification Whatsminer M30S++
150.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 112.0 TH/s
3,230 W Consommation électrique 3,472 W
21.5 J/TH Efficiency 31.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
12.8 kg Weight 12.0 kg
11,021 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,847 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1466

Daily Revenue 0.00006786 BTC $4.33
Daily Electricity -$7.75
Daily Profit -$3.42
Monthly -$102.54
Yearly -$1,247.57

Whatsminer M30S++

Daily Revenue 0.00005067 BTC $3.24
Daily Electricity -$8.33
Daily Profit -$5.10
Monthly -$152.90
Yearly -$1,860.31

Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1466, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 31% better efficacité (21.5 vs 31.0 J/TH). That said, the Whatsminer M30S++ isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Avalon A1466 — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Avalon A1466 and Whatsminer M30S++ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Avalon A1466 34% more hashrate (150 vs 112 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1466 7% better power draw (3,230 vs 3,472 W)
  • Avalon A1466 31% better efficacité (21.5 vs 31.0 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M30S++ 6% better weight (12.8 vs 12.0 kg)
  • Whatsminer M30S++ 7% more heat output (11,021 vs 11,847 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Avalon A1466 Metric Whatsminer M30S++
$4,200 Upfront cost (MSRP) $2,300
-$3.42 Daily net profit -$5.10
-$5,448 Net after 1 year -$4,160
-$6,695 Net after 2 years -$6,021
-$7,943 Net after 3 years -$7,881
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1466

21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Avalon A1466 vs Whatsminer M30S++: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1466 is more profitable at $-3.42/day compared to $-5.10/day for the Whatsminer M30S++. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1466 vs Whatsminer M30S++: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1466 or the Whatsminer M30S++?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Avalon A1466 and Whatsminer M30S++ on J/TH?

The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S++ runs at 31.0 J/TH — a difference of 9.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficacité (21.5 vs 31.0 J/TH).