Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1566

Avalon A1566

Taux de hachage 185.0 TH/s Puissance 3,420 W Efficiency 18.5 J/TH
VS
Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Taux de hachage 20.0 TH/s Puissance 1,700 W Efficiency 85.0 J/TH

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1566 Specification Canaan AvalonMiner 921
185.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 20.0 TH/s
3,420 W Consommation électrique 1,700 W
18.5 J/TH Efficiency 85.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
14.9 kg Weight
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,800 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1566

Daily Revenue 0.00008370 BTC $5.37
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$2.83
Monthly -$84.99
Yearly -$1,034.05

Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Daily Revenue 0.00000905 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$4.08
Daily Profit -$3.50
Monthly -$104.97
Yearly -$1,277.11

Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1566 l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 825% more hashrate (185.0 vs 20.0 TH/s). That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Avalon A1566 — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1566 and Canaan AvalonMiner 921 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1566 825% more hashrate (185.0 vs 20.0 TH/s)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner 921 50% better power draw (3,420 vs 1,700 W)
  • Avalon A1566 78% better efficacité (18.5 vs 85.0 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1566 101% more heat output (11,669 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1566 29% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Avalon A1566 Metric Canaan AvalonMiner 921
$5,500 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.83 Daily net profit -$3.50
-$6,534 Net after 1 year -$1,277
-$7,568 Net after 2 years -$2,554
-$8,602 Net after 3 years -$3,831
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1566

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1566

18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Avalon A1566 or Canaan AvalonMiner 921 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1566 is more profitable at $-2.83/day compared to $-3.50/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 921. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 921: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Avalon A1566 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1566 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 921?

The Avalon A1566 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 921). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 921: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 runs at 85.0 J/TH — a difference of 66.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficacité (18.5 vs 85.0 J/TH).