Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1366

Avalon A1366

Taux de hachage 130.0 TH/s Puissance 3,250 W Efficiency 25.0 J/TH
VS
Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Taux de hachage 20.0 TH/s Puissance 1,700 W Efficiency 85.0 J/TH

Avalon A1366 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1366 Specification Canaan AvalonMiner 921
130.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 20.0 TH/s
3,250 W Consommation électrique 1,700 W
25.0 J/TH Efficiency 85.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
12.6 kg Weight
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,800 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1366

Daily Revenue 0.00005881 BTC $3.78
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$4.02
Monthly -$120.69
Yearly -$1,468.39

Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Daily Revenue 0.00000905 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$4.08
Daily Profit -$3.50
Monthly -$104.97
Yearly -$1,277.11

Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1366 l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 550% more hashrate (130.0 vs 20.0 TH/s). That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Avalon A1366 — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Avalon A1366 and Canaan AvalonMiner 921 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Avalon A1366 550% more hashrate (130.0 vs 20.0 TH/s)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner 921 48% better power draw (3,250 vs 1,700 W)
  • Avalon A1366 71% better efficacité (25.0 vs 85.0 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1366 91% more heat output (11,089 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1366 29% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1366 Metric Canaan AvalonMiner 921
$3,500 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$4.02 Daily net profit -$3.50
-$4,968 Net after 1 year -$1,277
-$6,437 Net after 2 years -$2,554
-$7,905 Net after 3 years -$3,831
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1366

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1366

25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1366 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 921?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 is more profitable at $-3.50/day compared to $-4.02/day for the Avalon A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1366 or Canaan AvalonMiner 921?

The Avalon A1366 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Avalon A1366 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 921: which fits a residential setup better?

The Avalon A1366 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 921). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Avalon A1366 and Canaan AvalonMiner 921 on J/TH?

The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 runs at 85.0 J/TH — a difference of 60.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficacité (25.0 vs 85.0 J/TH).