Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1346

Avalon A1346

Taux de hachage 110.0 TH/s Puissance 3,300 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
VS
Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Taux de hachage 20.0 TH/s Puissance 1,700 W Efficiency 85.0 J/TH

Avalon A1346 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1346 Specification Canaan AvalonMiner 921
110.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 20.0 TH/s
3,300 W Consommation électrique 1,700 W
30.0 J/TH Efficiency 85.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
12.3 kg Weight
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,800 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1346

Daily Revenue 0.00004976 BTC $3.20
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$4.72
Monthly -$141.72
Yearly -$1,724.28

Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Daily Revenue 0.00000905 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$4.08
Daily Profit -$3.50
Monthly -$104.97
Yearly -$1,277.11

Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Avalon A1346 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 450% more hashrate (110.0 vs 20.0 TH/s) in the Avalon A1346's favour. The Canaan AvalonMiner 921 claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Avalon A1346 — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1346 and Canaan AvalonMiner 921 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1346 450% more hashrate (110.0 vs 20.0 TH/s)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner 921 48% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,700 W)
  • Avalon A1346 65% better efficacité (30.0 vs 85.0 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1346 94% more heat output (11,260 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1346 29% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1346 Metric Canaan AvalonMiner 921
$2,800 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$4.72 Daily net profit -$3.50
-$4,524 Net after 1 year -$1,277
-$6,249 Net after 2 years -$2,554
-$7,973 Net after 3 years -$3,831
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1346

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1346

30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1346 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 921?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 is more profitable at $-3.50/day compared to $-4.72/day for the Avalon A1346. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Avalon A1346 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Avalon A1346 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1346 or Canaan AvalonMiner 921?

The Avalon A1346 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 921). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Avalon A1346 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 921: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 runs at 85.0 J/TH — a difference of 55.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficacité (30.0 vs 85.0 J/TH).