Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1446

Avalon A1446

Taux de hachage 135.0 TH/s Puissance 3,310 W Efficiency 24.5 J/TH
VS
Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Taux de hachage 20.0 TH/s Puissance 1,700 W Efficiency 85.0 J/TH

Avalon A1446 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1446 Specification Canaan AvalonMiner 921
135.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 20.0 TH/s
3,310 W Consommation électrique 1,700 W
24.5 J/TH Efficiency 85.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
12.8 kg Weight
11,294 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,800 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1446

Daily Revenue 0.00006107 BTC $3.92
Daily Electricity -$7.94
Daily Profit -$4.02
Monthly -$120.65
Yearly -$1,467.93

Canaan AvalonMiner 921

Daily Revenue 0.00000905 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$4.08
Daily Profit -$3.50
Monthly -$104.97
Yearly -$1,277.11

Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Avalon A1446 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 575% more hashrate (135.0 vs 20.0 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 921 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Avalon A1446 — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1446 and Canaan AvalonMiner 921 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1446 575% more hashrate (135.0 vs 20.0 TH/s)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner 921 49% better power draw (3,310 vs 1,700 W)
  • Avalon A1446 71% better efficacité (24.5 vs 85.0 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1446 95% more heat output (11,294 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1446 29% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1446 Metric Canaan AvalonMiner 921
$3,200 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$4.02 Daily net profit -$3.50
-$4,668 Net after 1 year -$1,277
-$6,136 Net after 2 years -$2,554
-$7,604 Net after 3 years -$3,831
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1446

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1446

24.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1446 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 921?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 is more profitable at $-3.50/day compared to $-4.02/day for the Avalon A1446. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1446 or Canaan AvalonMiner 921?

The Avalon A1446 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1446 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 921?

The Avalon A1446 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 921). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Avalon A1446 and Canaan AvalonMiner 921 on J/TH?

The Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 921 runs at 85.0 J/TH — a difference of 60.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficacité (24.5 vs 85.0 J/TH).