Canaan Avalon A1566I vs NerdOctaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A1566I | Specification | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 249.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 4,500 W | Consommation électrique | 200 W |
| 18.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 11.3 kg | Weight | 0.8 kg |
| 15,354 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A1566I
NerdOctaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $75,351 and current network difficulty as of May 27, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon A1566I, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 3013% more hashrate (249.0 vs 8.0 TH/s). The NerdOctaxe Gamma holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan Avalon A1566I and NerdOctaxe Gamma diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 3013% more hashrate (249.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 96% better power draw (4,500 vs 200 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 28% better efficacité (18.1 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 10% better noise (50.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 93% better weight (11.3 vs 0.8 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 2150% more heat output (15,354 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 39% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon A1566I | Metric | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $2,710 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$2.17 | Daily net profit | -$0.20 |
| -$3,501 | Net after 1 year | -$673 |
| -$4,291 | Net after 2 years | -$747 |
| -$5,082 | Net after 3 years | -$821 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdOctaxe GammaScore: 61/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566I18.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan Avalon A1566I or NerdOctaxe Gamma more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdOctaxe Gamma is more profitable at $-0.20/day compared to $-2.17/day for the Canaan Avalon A1566I. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon A1566I vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: which runs at a lower noise level?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon A1566I at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan Avalon A1566I or the NerdOctaxe Gamma?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Canaan Avalon A1566I). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Canaan Avalon A1566I vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I runs at 18.1 J/TH while the NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 6.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 28% better efficacité (18.1 vs 25.0 J/TH).