Bitaxe Supra vs FluMiner T3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitaxe Supra | Specification | FluMiner T3 |
|---|---|---|
| 700.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 115.0 TH/s |
| 15 W | Consommation électrique | 1,700 W |
| 21.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 12.6 kg |
| 51 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,800 BTU/hr |
| 70/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | FluMiner |
Profitability Comparison
Bitaxe Supra
FluMiner T3
Based on BTC price of $62,245 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the FluMiner T3 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 16329% more hashrate (0.7 vs 115.0 TH/s). The Bitaxe Supra holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitaxe Supra and FluMiner T3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- FluMiner T3 16329% more hashrate (0.7 vs 115.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Supra 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 1,700.0 W)
- FluMiner T3 31% better efficacité (21.4 vs 14.8 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Supra 30% better noise (35.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Supra 98% better weight (0.3 vs 12.6 kg)
- FluMiner T3 11229% more heat output (51.2 vs 5,800.4 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Supra 25% more score de minage domestique (70.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitaxe Supra | Metric | FluMiner T3 |
|---|---|---|
| $89 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,601 |
| -$0.02 | Daily net profit | -$0.84 |
| -$95 | Net after 1 year | -$1,908 |
| -$101 | Net after 2 years | -$2,215 |
| -$107 | Net after 3 years | -$2,522 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe SupraScore: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
FluMiner T314.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitaxe Supra or FluMiner T3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Supra is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-0.84/day for the FluMiner T3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitaxe Supra or FluMiner T3?
The Bitaxe Supra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the FluMiner T3 at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitaxe Supra or FluMiner T3?
The Bitaxe Supra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the FluMiner T3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitaxe Supra and FluMiner T3 on J/TH?
The Bitaxe Supra runs at 21.4 J/TH while the FluMiner T3 runs at 14.8 J/TH — a difference of 6.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficacité (21.4 vs 14.8 J/TH).