Bitaxe Supra vs Whatsminer M50S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitaxe Supra | Specification | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| 700.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 126.0 TH/s |
| 15 W | Consommation électrique | 3,276 W |
| 21.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 51 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 70/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitaxe Supra
Whatsminer M50S
Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Supra edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,276.0 W). That said, the Whatsminer M50S isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitaxe Supra and Whatsminer M50S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M50S 17900% more hashrate (0.7 vs 126.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Supra 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,276.0 W)
- Bitaxe Supra 18% better efficacité (21.4 vs 26.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Supra 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Supra 98% better weight (0.3 vs 12.8 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S 21731% more heat output (51.2 vs 11,177.7 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Supra 94% more score de minage domestique (70.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitaxe Supra | Metric | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| $89 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$0.02 | Daily net profit | -$4.21 |
| -$95 | Net after 1 year | -$4,738 |
| -$100 | Net after 2 years | -$6,276 |
| -$106 | Net after 3 years | -$7,815 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe SupraScore: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Supra21.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitaxe Supra or Whatsminer M50S more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Supra is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-4.21/day for the Whatsminer M50S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitaxe Supra vs Whatsminer M50S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitaxe Supra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Whatsminer M50S at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitaxe Supra or Whatsminer M50S?
The Bitaxe Supra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Whatsminer M50S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitaxe Supra and Whatsminer M50S on J/TH?
The Bitaxe Supra runs at 21.4 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 4.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 18% better efficacité (21.4 vs 26.0 J/TH).