IceRiver KS3L vs IceRiver KS5L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3L | Specification | IceRiver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 640.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 283.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3L
IceRiver KS5L
Based on BTC price of $63,093 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the IceRiver KS5L edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 140% more hashrate (5.0 vs 12.0 TH/s) in the IceRiver KS5L's favour. The IceRiver KS3L claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS3L and IceRiver KS5L sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS5L 140% more hashrate (5.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3L 6% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,400 W)
- IceRiver KS5L 56% better efficacité (640 vs 283 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3L 4% better weight (14.4 vs 15.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS5L 6% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS3L | Metric | IceRiver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| $7,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$7.54 | Daily net profit | -$7.82 |
| -$10,251 | Net after 1 year | -$14,853 |
| -$13,002 | Net after 2 years | -$17,707 |
| -$15,753 | Net after 3 years | -$20,560 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS5L283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS3L vs IceRiver KS5L: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3L is more profitable at $-7.54/day compared to $-7.82/day for the IceRiver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS3L or the IceRiver KS5L better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
IceRiver KS3L vs IceRiver KS5L: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS3L and IceRiver KS5L on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 356.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (640 vs 283 J/TH).