Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 500.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 9.0 GH/s |
| 960 W | Power Consumption | 2,340 W |
| 1,920,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 260,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 14.2 kg |
| 3,276 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,984 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 40/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1700% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 1700% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 59% better power draw (960 vs 2,340 W)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 86% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 260,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 14.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 144% more heat output (3,276 vs 7,984 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 29% more home mining score (31.0 vs 40.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $469 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,399 |
| -$2.30 | Daily net profit | -$5.62 |
| -$1,310 | Net after 1 year | -$7,449 |
| -$2,151 | Net after 2 years | -$9,498 |
| -$2,992 | Net after 3 years | -$11,548 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)Score: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)260,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) is more profitable at $-2.30/day compared to $-5.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh): which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) runs at 1,920,000.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) runs at 260,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,660,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 260,000 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster