Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Hashrate 500.0 MH/s Power 960 W Efficiency 1,920,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo V2H

iPollo V2H

Hashrate 3.4 GH/s Power 475 W Efficiency 139,705.9 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs iPollo V2H

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) Specification iPollo V2H
500.0 MH/s Hashrate 3.4 GH/s
960 W Power Consumption 475 W
1,920,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 139,705.9 J/TH
Noise Level 65 dB
8,100.0 kg Weight 7.9 kg
3,276 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,621 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 55/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.30
Daily Profit -$2.30
Monthly -$69.12
Yearly -$840.95

iPollo V2H

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.14
Daily Profit -$1.14
Monthly -$34.20
Yearly -$416.06

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo V2H wins on 6 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 93% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 139,706 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo V2H — wins on 6 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and iPollo V2H diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iPollo V2H 580% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V2H 51% better power draw (960 vs 475 W)
  • iPollo V2H 93% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 139,706 J/TH)
  • iPollo V2H 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 7.9 kg)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 102% more heat output (3,276 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V2H 77% more home mining score (31.0 vs 55.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) Metric iPollo V2H
$469 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,850
-$2.30 Daily net profit -$1.14
-$1,310 Net after 1 year -$2,266
-$2,151 Net after 2 years -$2,682
-$2,992 Net after 3 years -$3,098
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V2H

Score: 55/100. 65 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V2H

139,705.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs iPollo V2H: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2H is more profitable at $-1.14/day compared to $-2.30/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or iPollo V2H?

The iPollo V2H is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or iPollo V2H?

The iPollo V2H scores 55/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and iPollo V2H?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) runs at 1,920,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 1,780,294.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 93% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 139,706 J/TH).