Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Hashrate 500.0 MH/s Power 960 W Efficiency 1,920,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo X1

iPollo X1

Hashrate 300.0 MH/s Power 240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs iPollo X1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) Specification iPollo X1
500.0 MH/s Hashrate 300.0 MH/s
960 W Power Consumption 240 W
1,920,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
8,100.0 kg Weight 1.5 kg
3,276 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.30
Daily Profit -$2.30
Monthly -$69.12
Yearly -$840.95

iPollo X1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo X1 edges it: 2 of 3 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 75% better power draw (960 vs 240 W). That said, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo X1 — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and iPollo X1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 67% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo X1 75% better power draw (960 vs 240 W)
  • iPollo X1 58% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo X1 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 1.5 kg)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 300% more heat output (3,276 vs 819 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) Metric iPollo X1
$469 Upfront cost (MSRP) $444
-$2.30 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$1,310 Net after 1 year -$654
-$2,151 Net after 2 years -$864
-$2,992 Net after 3 years -$1,075
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo X1

800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or iPollo X1 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo X1 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-2.30/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or iPollo X1?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or the iPollo X1?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and iPollo X1?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) runs at 1,920,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,120,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 800,000 J/TH).