Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Hashrate 500.0 MH/s Power 960 W Efficiency 1,920,000.0 J/TH

Jasminer X16-QE

Hashrate 1.8 GH/s Power 550 W Efficiency 314,285.7 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Jasminer X16-QE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)	Specification	Jasminer X16-QE
500.0 MH/s	Hashrate	1.8 GH/s
960 W	Power Consumption	550 W
1,920,000.0 J/TH	Efficiency	314,285.7 J/TH
—	Noise Level	40 dB
8,100.0 kg	Weight	10.0 kg
3,276 BTU/hr	BTU Output	1,877 BTU/hr
31/100	Home Mining Score	65/100
—	Release Year	—
EtHash	Algorithm	EtHash
Innosilicon	Manufacturer	Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

Electricity Rate:

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00

Daily Electricity -$2.30

Daily Profit -$2.30

Monthly -$69.12

Yearly -$840.95

Jasminer X16-QE

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00

Daily Electricity -$1.32

Daily Profit -$1.32

Monthly -$39.60

Yearly -$481.78

Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X16-QE edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 84% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 314,286 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Jasminer X16-QE — wins on 6 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and Jasminer X16-QE actually differ, with the gap quantified:

Jasminer X16-QE 250% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
Jasminer X16-QE 43% better power draw (960 vs 550 W)
Jasminer X16-QE 84% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 314,286 J/TH)
Jasminer X16-QE 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 10.0 kg)
Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 75% more heat output (3,276 vs 1,877 BTU/hr)
Jasminer X16-QE 110% more home mining score (31.0 vs 65.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)	Metric	Jasminer X16-QE
$469	Upfront cost (MSRP)	$469
-$2.30	Daily net profit	-$1.32
-$1,310	Net after 1 year	-$951
-$2,151	Net after 2 years	-$1,433
-$2,992	Net after 3 years	-$1,914
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)	Payback period	Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Jasminer X16-QE

Score: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X16-QE

314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Jasminer X16-QE: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-QE is more profitable at $-1.32/day compared to $-2.30/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or the Jasminer X16-QE better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Jasminer X16-QE is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Jasminer X16-QE: which fits a residential setup better?

The Jasminer X16-QE scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and Jasminer X16-QE?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) runs at 1,920,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,605,714.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 314,286 J/TH).

Compare Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) with...

Compare Jasminer X16-QE with...

Shop Miners Browse our full catalog of ASIC miners, Bitaxe, and accessories. ASIC Repair 2,500+ miners repaired. Expert diagnostics and board-level repair. Miner Database Compare 500+ miners with live profitability data.