Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Jasminer X16-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) | Specification | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| 750.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 5.8 GH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 1,900 W |
| 1,800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 327,586.2 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,483 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
Jasminer X16-P
Based on BTC price of $70,927 and current network difficulty as of Mar 25, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Jasminer X16-P wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-P327,586.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or Jasminer X16-P more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) is more profitable at $-3.24/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Jasminer X16-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or Jasminer X16-P?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or Jasminer X16-P?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Jasminer X16-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and Jasminer X16-P?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) runs at 1,800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH — a difference of 1,472,413.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.
Compare Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster