Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Hashrate 1.5 GH/s Power 2,350 W Efficiency 1,566,666.7 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1

iPollo V1

Hashrate 3.6 GH/s Power 3,100 W Efficiency 861,111.1 J/TH

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo V1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Specification iPollo V1
1.5 GH/s Hashrate 3.6 GH/s
2,350 W Power Consumption 3,100 W
1,566,666.7 J/TH Efficiency 861,111.1 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 13,000.0 kg
8,018 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,577 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.64
Daily Profit -$5.64
Monthly -$169.20
Yearly -$2,058.58

iPollo V1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$7.44
Monthly -$223.20
Yearly -$2,715.55

Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo V1 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 140% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo V1 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and iPollo V1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iPollo V1 140% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 24% better power draw (2,350 vs 3,100 W)
  • iPollo V1 45% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 861,111 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 32% more heat output (8,018 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 18% more home mining score (26.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Metric iPollo V1
$1,200 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,699
-$5.64 Daily net profit -$7.44
-$3,259 Net after 1 year -$4,415
-$5,317 Net after 2 years -$7,130
-$7,376 Net after 3 years -$9,846
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V1

861,111.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or iPollo V1 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) is more profitable at $-5.64/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo V1: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or iPollo V1?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo V1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and iPollo V1?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH — a difference of 705,555.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 861,111 J/TH).