Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell SC Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.9 TH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 210.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell SC Box II
Based on BTC price of $76,855 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC Box II edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 5135035% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.9 TH/s) in the Goldshell SC Box II's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell SC Box II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC Box II 5135035% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 10% better power draw (360 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell SC Box II 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 211 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC Box II 11% more heat output (1,228 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $379 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.89 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$705 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$1,031 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$1,357 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC Box II210.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell SC Box II more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-0.89/day for the Goldshell SC Box II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell SC Box II?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell SC Box II?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell SC Box II?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Box II runs at 210.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,519.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 211 J/TH).