Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.9 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 210.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell SC Box II
Based on BTC price of $76,855 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell SC Box II wins on 6 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 211 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell SC Box II actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell SC Box II 527678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC Box II 88% better power draw (3,300 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell SC Box II 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 211 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC Box II 36% better noise (55.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell SC Box II 83% better weight (13.5 vs 2.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 725% more heat output (11,260 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC Box II 38% more home mining score (50.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $379 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.89 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$705 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$1,031 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$1,357 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC Box IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC Box II210.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC Box II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Box II is more profitable at $-0.89/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell SC Box II?
The Goldshell SC Box II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell SC Box II?
The Goldshell SC Box II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC Box II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Box II runs at 210.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,456.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 211 J/TH).