Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell SC Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.9 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 210.5 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell SC Box II
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell SC Box II, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 211 J/TH) in the Goldshell SC Box II's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell SC Box II actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell SC Box II 351752% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC Box II 88% better power draw (3,200 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell SC Box II 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 211 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC Box II 59% better noise (85.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell SC Box II 82% better weight (12.5 vs 2.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 700% more heat output (10,918 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC Box II 138% more home mining score (29.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $379 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.89 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$705 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$1,031 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$1,357 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC Box IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC Box II210.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell SC Box II?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Box II is more profitable at $-0.89/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell SC Box II?
The Goldshell SC Box II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell SC Box II?
The Goldshell SC Box II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell SC Box II on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Box II runs at 210.5 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,715.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 211 J/TH).