Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell SC Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.9 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 210.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell SC Box II
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell SC Box II, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 34545355% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.9 TH/s). The Goldshell AE Card claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell SC Box II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC Box II 34545355% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 84% better power draw (65.0 vs 400.0 W)
- Goldshell SC Box II 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 211 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 86% better weight (0.3 vs 2.3 kg)
- Goldshell SC Box II 515% more heat output (222 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 3% more home mining score (71.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $379 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$0.89 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$705 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$1,031 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$1,357 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC Box II210.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell SC Box II more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-0.89/day for the Goldshell SC Box II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell SC Box II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell SC Box II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 69/100 for the Goldshell SC Box II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell SC Box II?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Box II runs at 210.5 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,971.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 211 J/TH).