Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell XT-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell XT-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 580.0 GH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 689.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Sha3x |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell XT-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell XT-BOX, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1567468% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.6 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX claws back ground on power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell XT-BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell XT-BOX 1567468% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 10% better power draw (360 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 690 J/TH)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 4% better weight (2.3 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 11% more heat output (1,228 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell XT-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $940 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.94 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$1,283 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$1,626 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$1,969 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell XT-BOX689.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell XT-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-0.94/day for the Goldshell XT-BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell XT-BOX?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell XT-BOX?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell XT-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell XT-BOX runs at 689.7 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,040.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 690 J/TH).