Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell XT-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell XT-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 580.0 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 689.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Sha3x |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell XT-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell XT-BOX comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 690 J/TH) in the Goldshell XT-BOX's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell XT-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell XT-BOX 161011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 88% better power draw (3,300 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 690 J/TH)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 36% better noise (55.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 84% better weight (13.5 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 725% more heat output (11,260 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 38% more home mining score (50.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell XT-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $940 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.94 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$1,283 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$1,626 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$1,969 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell XT-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell XT-BOX689.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell XT-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell XT-BOX is more profitable at $-0.94/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell XT-BOX?
The Goldshell XT-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell XT-BOX?
The Goldshell XT-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell XT-BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell XT-BOX runs at 689.7 J/TH — a difference of 9,165,977.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 690 J/TH).