Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell XT-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell XT-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 580.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 689.7 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Sha3x |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell XT-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell XT-BOX comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 690 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell XT-BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell XT-BOX 107307% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 88% better power draw (3,200 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 690 J/TH)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 59% better noise (85.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 82% better weight (12.5 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 700% more heat output (10,918 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 138% more home mining score (29.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell XT-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $940 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.94 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$1,283 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$1,626 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$1,969 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell XT-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell XT-BOX689.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell XT-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell XT-BOX is more profitable at $-0.94/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell XT-BOX?
The Goldshell XT-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell XT-BOX?
The Goldshell XT-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell XT-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell XT-BOX runs at 689.7 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,236.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 690 J/TH).