Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell SC-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Hashrate | 900.0 GH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 222.2 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell SC-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell SC-BOX, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 16363536% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.9 TH/s) in the Goldshell SC-BOX's favour. The Goldshell AE Card claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell SC-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC-BOX 16363536% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 68% better power draw (65.0 vs 200.0 W)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 222 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 100% better weight (0.3 vs 2,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 208% more heat output (222 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 115% more home mining score (71.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$0.45 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$463 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$626 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$790 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC-BOX222.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell SC-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-0.45/day for the Goldshell SC-BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell SC-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell SC-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell SC-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell SC-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell SC-BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell SC-BOX runs at 222.2 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,959.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 222 J/TH).