Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell SC-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 900.0 GH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 222.2 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell SC-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC-BOX edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 222 J/TH) in the Goldshell SC-BOX's favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX II holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell SC-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC-BOX 1666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 62% better power draw (530 vs 200 W)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 222 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 2,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 165% more heat output (1,808 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 97% more home mining score (65.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.45 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$463 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$626 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$790 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC-BOX222.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell SC-BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC-BOX is more profitable at $-0.45/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell SC-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell SC-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell SC-BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell SC-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell SC-BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell SC-BOX runs at 222.2 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,592.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 222 J/TH).