Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 900.0 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 222.2 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell SC-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell SC-BOX wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 222 J/TH) in the Goldshell SC-BOX's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell SC-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC-BOX 249900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 94% better power draw (3,300 vs 200 W)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 222 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 99% better weight (13.5 vs 2,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 1550% more heat output (11,260 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 52% more home mining score (50.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.45 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$463 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$626 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$790 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC-BOX222.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC-BOX is more profitable at $-0.45/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell SC-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell SC-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell SC-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell SC-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell SC-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell SC-BOX runs at 222.2 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,444.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 222 J/TH).