Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Goldshell AL BOX III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Specification | Goldshell AL BOX III |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 1.3 TH/s |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 600 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 480.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 614 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 33/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Goldshell AL BOX III
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell AL BOX III comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 247% more hashrate (0.4 vs 1.3 TH/s) in the Goldshell AL BOX III's favour. That said, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Goldshell AL BOX III actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AL BOX III 247% more hashrate (0.4 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 70% better power draw (180 vs 600 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 4% better efficiency (500 vs 480 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 233% more heat output (614 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 10% more home mining score (33.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Metric | Goldshell AL BOX III |
|---|---|---|
| $340 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $139 |
| -$0.42 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$493 | Net after 1 year | -$648 |
| -$646 | Net after 2 years | -$1,157 |
| -$799 | Net after 3 years | -$1,667 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX III480.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or Goldshell AL BOX III more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) is more profitable at $-0.42/day compared to $-1.40/day for the Goldshell AL BOX III. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or the Goldshell AL BOX III better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Goldshell AL BOX III: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX III). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Goldshell AL BOX III on J/TH?
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Goldshell AL BOX III runs at 480.0 J/TH — a difference of 20.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 4% better efficiency (500 vs 480 J/TH).