Goldshell AL MAX vs colengine P2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL MAX | Specification | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 38.0 GH/s |
| 3,350 W | Power Consumption | 1,458 W |
| 403.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 38,368.4 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 11,430 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,975 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | colengine |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL MAX
colengine P2
Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell AL MAX comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 21742% more hashrate (8.3 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell AL MAX's favour. The colengine P2 claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AL MAX and colengine P2 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AL MAX 21742% more hashrate (8.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- colengine P2 56% better power draw (3,350 vs 1,458 W)
- Goldshell AL MAX 99% better efficiency (404 vs 38,368 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL MAX 44% better noise (45.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- Goldshell AL MAX 8% better weight (13.5 vs 14.8 kg)
- Goldshell AL MAX 130% more heat output (11,430 vs 4,975 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL MAX 32% more home mining score (50.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AL MAX | Metric | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,370 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,290 |
| -$7.74 | Daily net profit | -$3.50 |
| -$5,195 | Net after 1 year | -$2,567 |
| -$8,021 | Net after 2 years | -$3,843 |
| -$10,846 | Net after 3 years | -$5,120 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL MAXScore: 50/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL MAX403.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AL MAX vs colengine P2: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the colengine P2 is more profitable at $-3.50/day compared to $-7.74/day for the Goldshell AL MAX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AL MAX or colengine P2?
The Goldshell AL MAX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the colengine P2 at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AL MAX or colengine P2?
The Goldshell AL MAX scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 38/100 for the colengine P2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AL MAX and colengine P2?
The Goldshell AL MAX runs at 403.6 J/TH while the colengine P2 runs at 38,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 37,964.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (404 vs 38,368 J/TH).