Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer AL1

Antminer AL1

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 3,360 W Efficiency 210.0 J/TH
VS
Bitmain ANTMINER DR7

Bitmain ANTMINER DR7

Hashrate 127.0 TH/s Power 2,730 W Efficiency 21.5 J/TH

Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain ANTMINER DR7

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer AL1 Specification Bitmain ANTMINER DR7
16.0 TH/s Hashrate 127.0 TH/s
3,360 W Power Consumption 2,730 W
210.0 J/TH Efficiency 21.5 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.5 kg Weight 1.6 kg
11,464 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,315 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
Blake3 Algorithm Blake256r14
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer AL1

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.57
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$7.49
Monthly -$224.71
Yearly -$2,733.93

Bitmain ANTMINER DR7

Daily Revenue 0.00005844 BTC $4.55
Daily Electricity -$6.55
Daily Profit -$2.00
Monthly -$59.93
Yearly -$729.11

Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7, which leads on 4 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 90% better efficiency (210.0 vs 21.5 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 694% more hashrate (16.0 vs 127.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 19% better power draw (3,360 vs 2,730 W)
  • Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 90% better efficiency (210.0 vs 21.5 J/TH)
  • Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 89% better weight (14.5 vs 1.6 kg)
  • Antminer AL1 23% more heat output (11,464 vs 9,315 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Antminer AL1 Metric Bitmain ANTMINER DR7
$10,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,639
-$7.49 Daily net profit -$2.00
-$12,734 Net after 1 year -$2,368
-$15,468 Net after 2 years -$3,097
-$18,202 Net after 3 years -$3,826
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain ANTMINER DR7

21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 is more profitable at $-2.00/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain ANTMINER DR7?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 on J/TH?

The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 188.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 90% better efficiency (210.0 vs 21.5 J/TH).