Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain ANTMINER DR7

Bitmain ANTMINER DR7

Hashrate 127.0 TH/s Power 2,730 W Efficiency 21.5 J/TH
VS
Antminer K7

Antminer K7

Hashrate 63.5 TH/s Power 3,080 W Efficiency 48.5 J/TH

Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 vs Antminer K7

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 Specification Antminer K7
127.0 TH/s Hashrate 63.5 TH/s
2,730 W Power Consumption 3,080 W
21.5 J/TH Efficiency 48.5 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
1.6 kg Weight 14.0 kg
9,315 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,509 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithm Eaglesong
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain ANTMINER DR7

Daily Revenue 0.00005844 BTC $4.55
Daily Electricity -$6.55
Daily Profit -$2.00
Monthly -$59.93
Yearly -$729.11

Antminer K7

Daily Revenue 0.00002922 BTC $2.28
Daily Electricity -$7.39
Daily Profit -$5.11
Monthly -$153.44
Yearly -$1,866.90

Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 56% better efficiency (21.5 vs 48.5 J/TH) in the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 and Antminer K7 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 100% more hashrate (127.0 vs 63.5 TH/s)
  • Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 11% better power draw (2,730 vs 3,080 W)
  • Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 56% better efficiency (21.5 vs 48.5 J/TH)
  • Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 89% better weight (1.6 vs 14.0 kg)
  • Antminer K7 13% more heat output (9,315 vs 10,509 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 Metric Antminer K7
$1,639 Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,500
-$2.00 Daily net profit -$5.11
-$2,368 Net after 1 year -$5,367
-$3,097 Net after 2 years -$7,234
-$3,826 Net after 3 years -$9,101
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain ANTMINER DR7

21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 or Antminer K7 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 is more profitable at $-2.00/day compared to $-5.11/day for the Antminer K7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 or the Antminer K7 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 or the Antminer K7?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 and Antminer K7 on J/TH?

The Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH — a difference of 27.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficiency (21.5 vs 48.5 J/TH).