Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 198.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 5,445 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 27.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 17,500.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,578 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 16/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1138% more hashrate (16.0 vs 198.0 TH/s). The Antminer AL1 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) 1138% more hashrate (16.0 vs 198.0 TH/s)
- Antminer AL1 38% better power draw (3,360 vs 5,445 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) 87% better efficiency (210.0 vs 27.5 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 17,500.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) 62% more heat output (11,464 vs 18,578 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 125% more home mining score (36.0 vs 16.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,141 |
| -$7.50 | Daily net profit | -$6.06 |
| -$12,737 | Net after 1 year | -$3,353 |
| -$15,473 | Net after 2 years | -$5,565 |
| -$18,210 | Net after 3 years | -$7,777 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)27.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) is more profitable at $-6.06/day compared to $-7.50/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 16/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) runs at 27.5 J/TH — a difference of 182.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (210.0 vs 27.5 J/TH).