Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 198.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Power Consumption | 5,445 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 27.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 17,500.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,578 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 16/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)
Based on BTC price of $77,152 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 11086% more hashrate (1.8 vs 198.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)'s favour. The Antminer D9 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) 11086% more hashrate (1.8 vs 198.0 TH/s)
- Antminer D9 48% better power draw (2,839 vs 5,445 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) 98% better efficiency (1,604.0 vs 27.5 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 100% better weight (16.1 vs 17,500.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) 92% more heat output (9,687 vs 18,578 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 125% more home mining score (36.0 vs 16.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,141 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$6.04 |
| -$5,464 | Net after 1 year | -$3,345 |
| -$7,928 | Net after 2 years | -$5,549 |
| -$10,392 | Net after 3 years | -$7,753 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)27.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) is more profitable at $-6.04/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 16/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th) runs at 27.5 J/TH — a difference of 1,576.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficiency (1,604.0 vs 27.5 J/TH).