Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer D7

Antminer D7

Hashrate 1,286.0 GH/s Power 3,148 W Efficiency 2,447.9 J/TH
VS
Bitmain Antminer S3

Bitmain Antminer S3

Hashrate 478.0 GH/s Power 366 W Efficiency 765.7 J/TH

Antminer D7 vs Bitmain Antminer S3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer D7 Specification Bitmain Antminer S3
1,286.0 GH/s Hashrate 478.0 GH/s
3,148 W Power Consumption 366 W
2,447.9 J/TH Efficiency 765.7 J/TH
70 dB Noise Level
14.4 kg Weight 5,200.0 kg
10,741 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,249 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 34/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer D7

Daily Revenue 0.00000059 BTC $0.05
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$7.51
Monthly -$225.25
Yearly -$2,740.58

Bitmain Antminer S3

Daily Revenue 0.00000022 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$0.88
Daily Profit -$0.86
Monthly -$25.83
Yearly -$314.27

Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

The Antminer D7 and Bitmain Antminer S3 finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.

Spec Deltas

The Antminer D7 and Bitmain Antminer S3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer D7 169% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.5 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer S3 88% better power draw (3,148 vs 366 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer S3 69% better efficiency (2,448 vs 766 J/TH)
  • Antminer D7 100% better weight (14.4 vs 5,200.0 kg)
  • Antminer D7 760% more heat output (10,741 vs 1,249 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer D7 6% more home mining score (36.0 vs 34.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer D7 Metric Bitmain Antminer S3
$2,500 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.51 Daily net profit -$0.86
-$5,241 Net after 1 year -$314
-$7,981 Net after 2 years -$629
-$10,722 Net after 3 years -$943
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer D7

Score: 36/100. 70 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer S3

765.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer D7 or the Bitmain Antminer S3?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S3 is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-7.51/day for the Antminer D7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer D7 or the Bitmain Antminer S3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Antminer D7 is quieter at 70 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer D7 or Bitmain Antminer S3?

The Antminer D7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer D7 vs Bitmain Antminer S3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer D7 runs at 2,447.9 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S3 runs at 765.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,682.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficiency (2,448 vs 766 J/TH).