Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs Jasminer X16-Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 GH/s | Hashrate | 1,950.0 MH/s |
| 2,556 W | Power Consumption | 620 W |
| 1,065,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 317,948.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 8,721 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,115 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)
Jasminer X16-Q
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X16-Q edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 76% better power draw (2,556 vs 620 W) in the Jasminer X16-Q's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and Jasminer X16-Q diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 23% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q 76% better power draw (2,556 vs 620 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 70% better efficiency (1,065,000 vs 317,949 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 312% more heat output (8,721 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 195% more home mining score (22.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| $1,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $789 |
| -$6.13 | Daily net profit | -$1.49 |
| -$3,239 | Net after 1 year | -$1,332 |
| -$5,478 | Net after 2 years | -$1,875 |
| -$7,717 | Net after 3 years | -$2,418 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) or the Jasminer X16-Q?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-6.13/day for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs Jasminer X16-Q: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs Jasminer X16-Q: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and Jasminer X16-Q on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) runs at 1,065,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH — a difference of 747,051.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 70% better efficiency (1,065,000 vs 317,949 J/TH).