Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) vs iBeLink BM-K1 Max
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) | Specification | iBeLink BM-K1 Max |
|---|---|---|
| 166.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 32.0 TH/s |
| 3,154 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 19.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 100.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 16,100.0 kg | Weight | 12,200.0 kg |
| 10,761 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)
iBeLink BM-K1 Max
Based on BTC price of $78,253 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) edges it: 4 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 81% better efficiency (19.0 vs 100.0 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)'s favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) and iBeLink BM-K1 Max actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) 419% more hashrate (166.0 vs 32.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) 1% better power draw (3,154 vs 3,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) 81% better efficiency (19.0 vs 100.0 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 24% better weight (16,100 vs 12,200 kg)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 1% more heat output (10,761 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) | Metric | iBeLink BM-K1 Max |
|---|---|---|
| $1,399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,250 |
| -$1.59 | Daily net profit | -$6.53 |
| -$1,980 | Net after 1 year | -$3,633 |
| -$2,561 | Net after 2 years | -$6,015 |
| -$3,142 | Net after 3 years | -$8,398 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)19.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) or the iBeLink BM-K1 Max?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) is more profitable at $-1.59/day compared to $-6.53/day for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) vs iBeLink BM-K1 Max: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) vs iBeLink BM-K1 Max: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) and iBeLink BM-K1 Max on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) runs at 19.0 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-K1 Max runs at 100.0 J/TH — a difference of 81.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficiency (19.0 vs 100.0 J/TH).