Antminer L3+ vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer L3+ | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 504.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 9.2 GH/s |
| 800 W | Power Consumption | 3,425 W |
| 1,587,301.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 373,908.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 5.5 kg | Weight | 15,000.0 kg |
| 2,730 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,686 BTU/hr |
| 82/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer L3+
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) edges it: 2 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 1717% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Antminer L3+ holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer L3+ and Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) 1717% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Antminer L3+ 77% better power draw (800 vs 3,425 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) 76% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 373,908 J/TH)
- Antminer L3+ 100% better weight (5.5 vs 15,000.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) 328% more heat output (2,730 vs 11,686 BTU/hr)
- Antminer L3+ 273% more home mining score (82.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer L3+ | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,599 |
| -$1.92 | Daily net profit | -$8.22 |
| -$701 | Net after 1 year | -$4,599 |
| -$1,402 | Net after 2 years | -$7,599 |
| -$2,102 | Net after 3 years | -$10,600 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer L3+Score: 82/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)373,908.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer L3+ or Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer L3+ is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-8.22/day for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer L3+ or the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer L3+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer L3+ or Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)?
The Antminer L3+ scores 82/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer L3+ vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer L3+ runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) runs at 373,908.3 J/TH — a difference of 1,213,393.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 373,908 J/TH).