Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer L3+

Antminer L3+

Hashrate 504.0 MH/s Power 800 W Efficiency 1,587,301.6 J/TH
VS
Antminer L9

Antminer L9

Hashrate 16,000.0 MH/s Power 3,360 W Efficiency 210,000.0 J/TH

Antminer L3+ vs Antminer L9

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer L3+ Specification Antminer L9
504.0 MH/s Hashrate 16,000.0 MH/s
800 W Power Consumption 3,360 W
1,587,301.6 J/TH Efficiency 210,000.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
5.5 kg Weight 14.8 kg
2,730 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,464 BTU/hr
82/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithm Scrypt
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer L3+

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.92
Daily Profit -$1.92
Monthly -$57.60
Yearly -$700.79

Antminer L9

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$8.06
Monthly -$241.90
Yearly -$2,943.15

Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer L9, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 3075% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Antminer L3+ holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Antminer L9 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer L3+ and Antminer L9 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer L9 3075% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer L3+ 76% better power draw (800 vs 3,360 W)
  • Antminer L9 87% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 210,000 J/TH)
  • Antminer L3+ 63% better weight (5.5 vs 14.8 kg)
  • Antminer L9 320% more heat output (2,730 vs 11,464 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer L3+ 128% more home mining score (82.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer L3+ Metric Antminer L9
Upfront cost (MSRP) $6,500
-$1.92 Daily net profit -$8.06
-$701 Net after 1 year -$9,443
-$1,402 Net after 2 years -$12,386
-$2,102 Net after 3 years -$15,329
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer L3+

Score: 82/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer L9

210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer L3+ or Antminer L9 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer L3+ is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer L9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer L3+ vs Antminer L9: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer L3+ or the Antminer L9?

The Antminer L3+ scores 82/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer L9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer L3+ vs Antminer L9: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer L3+ runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH while the Antminer L9 runs at 210,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,377,301.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 210,000 J/TH).