Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U vs Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 PH/s | Hashrate | 16.0 TH/s |
| 11,020 W | Power Consumption | 1,280 W |
| 9.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 80.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 4,560.0 kg |
| 37,600 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,367 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,123 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 7150% more hashrate (1,160.0 vs 16.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U and Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 7150% more hashrate (1,160.0 vs 16.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 88% better power draw (11,020 vs 1,280 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 88% better efficiency (9.5 vs 80.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 761% more heat output (37,600 vs 4,367 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 42% more home mining score (44.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $7,988 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| $17.11 | Daily net profit | -$2.47 |
| -$1,744 | Net after 1 year | -$902 |
| +$4,500 | Net after 2 years | -$1,804 |
| +$10,744 | Net after 3 years | -$2,706 |
| Pays for itself in ~15 months at current rates | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U$19.58/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3UScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U9.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U vs Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U is more profitable at $17.11/day compared to $-2.47/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U or Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U or the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U and Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U runs at 9.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH — a difference of 70.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 88% better efficiency (9.5 vs 80.0 J/TH).