Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 2,000 W Efficiency 40.0 J/TH

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Hashrate 33.0 TH/s Power 2,600 W Efficiency 78.8 J/TH

Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)	Specification	Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
50.0 TH/s	Hashrate	33.0 TH/s
2,000 W	Power Consumption	2,600 W
40.0 J/TH	Efficiency	78.8 J/TH
70 dB	Noise Level	—
7.5 kg	Weight	10,000.0 kg
6,824 BTU/hr	BTU Output	8,871 BTU/hr
42/100	Home Mining Score	22/100
—	Release Year	—
SHA-256	Algorithm	SHA-256
D-Central	Manufacturer	Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

Electricity Rate:

$/kWh

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.82

Daily Electricity -$4.80

Daily Profit -$2.98

Monthly -$89.43

Yearly -$1,088.10

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Daily Revenue 0.00001519 BTC $1.20

Daily Electricity -$6.24

Daily Profit -$5.04

Monthly -$151.19

Yearly -$1,839.43

Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 49% better efficiency (40.0 vs 78.8 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer Slim Edition (S17) — wins on 5 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ sit on each measurable spec:

Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 52% more hashrate (50.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 23% better power draw (2,000 vs 2,600 W)
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 49% better efficiency (40.0 vs 78.8 J/TH)
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 100% better weight (7.5 vs 10,000.0 kg)
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 30% more heat output (6,824 vs 8,871 BTU/hr)
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 91% more home mining score (42.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)	Metric	Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
$600	Upfront cost (MSRP)	—
-$2.98	Daily net profit	-$5.04
-$1,688	Net after 1 year	-$1,839
-$2,776	Net after 2 years	-$3,679
-$3,864	Net after 3 years	-$5,518
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)	Payback period	—

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Score: 42/100. 70 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) is more profitable at $-2.98/day compared to $-5.04/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) is quieter at 70 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) scores 42/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ on J/TH?

The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ runs at 78.8 J/TH — a difference of 38.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 49% better efficiency (40.0 vs 78.8 J/TH).

Compare Antminer Slim Edition (S17) with...

Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ with...

Shop Miners Browse our full catalog of ASIC miners, Bitaxe, and accessories. ASIC Repair 2,500+ miners repaired. Expert diagnostics and board-level repair. Miner Database Compare 500+ miners with live profitability data.