Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 64.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 84.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,150 W |
| 50.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 37.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 10,000.0 kg | Weight | 14,200.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,748 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)
Based on BTC price of $77,862 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 25% better efficiency (50.0 vs 37.5 J/TH). The Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) claws back ground on price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) and Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) 31% more hashrate (64.0 vs 84.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) 2% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,150 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) 25% better efficiency (50.0 vs 37.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 30% better weight (10,000 vs 14,200 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 2% more heat output (10,918 vs 10,748 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $75 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $179 |
| -$5.39 | Daily net profit | -$4.55 |
| -$2,041 | Net after 1 year | -$1,840 |
| -$4,007 | Net after 2 years | -$3,501 |
| -$5,974 | Net after 3 years | -$5,161 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)37.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) or the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) is more profitable at $-4.55/day compared to $-5.39/day for the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) or the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) or Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) and Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) runs at 37.5 J/TH — a difference of 12.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficiency (50.0 vs 37.5 J/TH).