Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AT2880 | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T |
|---|---|---|
| 260.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 32.0 TH/s |
| 4,420 W | Power Consumption | 2,200 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 68.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 7,500.0 kg |
| 15,081 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AT2880
Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T
Based on BTC price of $77,730 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 713% more hashrate (260.0 vs 32.0 TH/s) in the Auradine Teraflux AT2880's favour. The Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 713% more hashrate (260.0 vs 32.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T 50% better power draw (4,420 vs 2,200 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 75% better efficiency (17.0 vs 68.8 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 101% more heat output (15,081 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Auradine Teraflux AT2880 | Metric | Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,266 |
| -$1.31 | Daily net profit | -$4.14 |
| -$477 | Net after 1 year | -$2,775 |
| -$955 | Net after 2 years | -$4,284 |
| -$1,432 | Net after 3 years | -$5,794 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32TScore: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AT288017.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is more profitable at $-1.31/day compared to $-4.14/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T: which fits a residential setup better?
The Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T runs at 68.8 J/TH — a difference of 51.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficiency (17.0 vs 68.8 J/TH).
Compare Auradine Teraflux AT2880 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer S17
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator