Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AT2880 | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 |
|---|---|---|
| 260.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 236.0 TH/s |
| 4,420 W | Power Consumption | 3,422 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 15,081 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,676 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AT2880
MicroBT WhatsMiner M70
Based on BTC price of $79,177 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 23% better power draw (4,420 vs 3,422 W). The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 claws back ground on hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 10% more hashrate (260 vs 236 TH/s)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 23% better power draw (4,420 vs 3,422 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 15% better efficiency (17.0 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 29% more heat output (15,081 vs 11,676 BTU/hr)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M70$1.49/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M70Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7014.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 is more profitable at $0.65/day compared to $-0.84/day for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M70?
The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 2.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficiency (17.0 vs 14.5 J/TH).
Compare Auradine Teraflux AT2880 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer S17