Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 115.0 TH/s |
| 2,380 W | Power Consumption | 3,500 W |
| 64.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.4 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 7,600.0 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 8,121 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 211% more hashrate (37.0 vs 115.0 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 211% more hashrate (37.0 vs 115.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 32% better power draw (2,380 vs 3,500 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 53% better efficiency (64.3 vs 30.4 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 100% better weight (7,600.0 vs 13.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 47% more heat output (8,121 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 38% more home mining score (26.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $609 |
| -$4.37 | Daily net profit | -$4.22 |
| -$1,594 | Net after 1 year | -$2,148 |
| -$3,187 | Net after 2 years | -$3,687 |
| -$4,781 | Net after 3 years | -$5,226 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan AvalonMiner A1326Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner A132630.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 or the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 is more profitable at $-4.22/day compared to $-4.37/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 or the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 on J/TH?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 runs at 30.4 J/TH — a difference of 33.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficiency (64.3 vs 30.4 J/TH).