Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitaxe Gamma

Bitaxe Gamma

Hashrate 1,200.0 GH/s Power 15 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Hashrate 52.0 TH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 53.9 J/TH

Bitaxe Gamma vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe Gamma Specification Innosilicon T3+ 52T
1,200.0 GH/s Hashrate 52.0 TH/s
15 W Power Consumption 2,800 W
12.5 J/TH Efficiency 53.9 J/TH
38 dB Noise Level
0.3 kg Weight 10,000.0 kg
51 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,554 BTU/hr
70/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe Gamma

Daily Revenue 0.00000055 BTC $0.04
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit $0.01
Monthly $0.23
Yearly $2.83

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Daily Revenue 0.00002393 BTC $1.90
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$4.82
Monthly -$144.73
Yearly -$1,760.84

Based on BTC price of $79,223 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Gamma edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 2,800.0 W). The Innosilicon T3+ 52T holds the edge in hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Bitaxe Gamma — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Bitaxe Gamma and Innosilicon T3+ 52T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 4233% more hashrate (1.2 vs 52.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 2,800.0 W)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 77% better efficiency (12.5 vs 53.9 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 100% better weight (0.3 vs 10,000.0 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 18559% more heat output (51.2 vs 9,553.6 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 218% more home mining score (70.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bitaxe Gamma Metric Innosilicon T3+ 52T
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP)
$0.01 Daily net profit -$4.82
-$96 Net after 1 year -$1,761
-$93 Net after 2 years -$3,522
-$91 Net after 3 years -$5,283
Takes ~35.0 years to pay back at current rates Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitaxe Gamma

$4.83/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe Gamma

Score: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Gamma

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitaxe Gamma or Innosilicon T3+ 52T more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.01/day compared to $-4.82/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitaxe Gamma vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ 52T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitaxe Gamma or the Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Bitaxe Gamma and Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

The Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 52T runs at 53.9 J/TH — a difference of 41.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficiency (12.5 vs 53.9 J/TH).