iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Specification | iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner |
|---|---|---|
| 32.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 19.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,100 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.2 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 12,200.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1 Max
iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 68% more hashrate (32.0 vs 19.0 TH/s). The iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-K1 Max and iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 68% more hashrate (32.0 vs 19.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 3% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,100 W)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 39% better efficiency (100 vs 163 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 100% better weight (12,200.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 3% more heat output (10,918 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Metric | iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner |
|---|---|---|
| $1,250 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,330 |
| -$6.55 | Daily net profit | -$6.77 |
| -$3,640 | Net after 1 year | -$3,800 |
| -$6,030 | Net after 2 years | -$6,270 |
| -$8,419 | Net after 3 years | -$8,740 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin MinerScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K1 Max100.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max is more profitable at $-6.55/day compared to $-6.77/day for the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-K1 Max at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner?
The iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K1 Max and iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner?
The iBeLink BM-K1 Max runs at 100.0 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner runs at 163.2 J/TH — a difference of 63.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 39% better efficiency (100 vs 163 J/TH).
