iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | Goldshell KD-BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.6 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 28.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 1.1 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 256 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 98% better power draw (3,400.0 vs 75.0 W) in the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro's favour. The iBeLink BM-KS Max holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-KS Max and Goldshell KD-BOX Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 323% more hashrate (11.0 vs 2.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 98% better power draw (3,400.0 vs 75.0 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 91% better efficiency (309.1 vs 28.9 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 91% better weight (12.2 vs 1.1 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 4433% more heat output (11,601 vs 256 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 97% more home mining score (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | Goldshell KD-BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$0.09 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$731 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$762 |
| -$10,301 | Net after 3 years | -$794 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD-BOX ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro28.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is more profitable at $-0.09/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or Goldshell KD-BOX Pro?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-KS Max at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the iBeLink BM-KS Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-KS Max and Goldshell KD-BOX Pro on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro runs at 28.9 J/TH — a difference of 280.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficiency (309.1 vs 28.9 J/TH).