iBeLink BM-KS Max vs IceRiver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 600 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
IceRiver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-KS Max, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1000% more hashrate (11.0 vs 1.0 TH/s). That said, the IceRiver KS1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-KS Max and IceRiver KS1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 1000% more hashrate (11.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 82% better power draw (3,400 vs 600 W)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 48% better efficiency (309 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS1 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 19% better weight (12.2 vs 15.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 467% more heat output (11,601 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 42% more home mining score (36.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$3,012 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$3,525 |
| -$10,301 | Net after 3 years | -$4,037 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-KS Max309.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or IceRiver KS1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or IceRiver KS1?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-KS Max at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the IceRiver KS1?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the iBeLink BM-KS Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-KS Max and IceRiver KS1?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 290.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 48% better efficiency (309 vs 600 J/TH).